Score History
64 cycles completed. Each cycle tests active hypotheses and updates the belief state.
2026-04-15
Surprise: 0.0219Beliefs: 39 → 39
134
Total
109
Active
18
Eliminated
57
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.08The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.95The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.95The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.11The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.76The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.94The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.35The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.94The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.77The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.30The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.94The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.93The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.71The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.86The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.94The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.17The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.95The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.96The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.68Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.96The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.96The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.95Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.78The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.97The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.92The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.94The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.97The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.94The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0460.96The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.97The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.94The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.95The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.92The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.95The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.96The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.96The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.80Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.93The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.94The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.92The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.92The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.92The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.92The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.06The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.88The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.91The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.92The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.13The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.86The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.12The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.06The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
H0690.88The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.81The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.88The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.72The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.59The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.82The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.85The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.91The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.56The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.83The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0790.10The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0800.10The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the active
H0810.82The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.74The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.75The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.73The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.79The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.72The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.11The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaactive
H0880.62The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
H0890.59The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where 2-4 glyphactive
H0900.79The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs drawn from the set {active
H0910.73The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0920.81Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher tables (not merely two scribal hands) eactive
H0930.75The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) encodes running prose rather thanactive
H0940.37The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs from the set {y,n,l,active
H0950.78Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying active
H0960.76The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is produced by a active
H0970.73The strong positional constraints on word-initial glyphs {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyphs {y,n,l,r,active
H0980.73The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents unenciphered or minimally enciphereactive
H0990.35The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from {y,n,l,r,o} active
H1000.59Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlyiactive
H1010.69The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1020.42The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are artifactsactive
H1030.58The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) encodes unenciphered active
H1040.19The Voynich Manuscript encodes a late medieval Moravian (Old Czech/Slavic) dialect using a constructactive
H1050.26The Voynich script is a semi-syllabic system derived from Balkan scribal traditions, where complex gactive
H1060.15The Voynich Manuscript is a trilingual pharmaceutical compendium encoding plant-based medicine in a active
H1070.4074.4% of Voynich plant illustrations match Mediterranean species at >=80% confidence: 100% Mediterraactive
H1080.47The word 'daiin' (799 occurrences, rank 1) decomposes as 'da' (give) + 'in' (in water), a pharmaceutactive
H1090.31Jaccard Index between Voynich vocabulary and proposed decipherment vocabulary is J~0.08, independentactive
H1100.57The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from the set {y, active
H1110.50The Currier A and Currier B sub-corpora use two structurally distinct cipher tables encoding the samactive
H1120.34The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1130.47The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unencipheractive
H1140.37The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d accounting for most word starts) and word-active
2026-04-15
Surprise: 0.0174Beliefs: 42 → 43
159
Total
128
Active
24
Eliminated
83
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.17The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.98The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.98The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.38The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.90The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.80The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.97The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.53The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.97The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.81The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.45The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.97The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.90The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.97The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.84The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.54The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.90The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.95The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.14The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.97The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.98The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.73Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.98The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.98The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.98Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.84The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.99The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.96The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.96The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.97The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0460.98The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.99The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.97The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.98The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.95The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.98The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.98The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.98The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.86Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.96The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.97The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.95The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.96The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.96The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.96The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0620.95The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.96The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.96The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.33The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.94The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.04The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixeliminated
H0690.94The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.89The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.94The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.79The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.66The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.90The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.93The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.96The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.64The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.92The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0810.92The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.85The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.88The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.87The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.90The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.79The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.04The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaeliminated
H0880.72The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
H0890.66The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where 2-4 glyphactive
H0900.90The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs drawn from the set {active
H0910.85The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0920.92Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher tables (not merely two scribal hands) eactive
H0930.88The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) encodes running prose rather thanactive
H0940.14The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs from the set {y,n,l,active
H0950.90Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying active
H0960.83The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is produced by a active
H0970.87The strong positional constraints on word-initial glyphs {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyphs {y,n,l,r,active
H0980.85The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents unenciphered or minimally enciphereactive
H0990.13The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from {y,n,l,r,o} active
H1000.77Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlyiactive
H1010.82The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1020.53The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are artifactsactive
H1030.81The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) encodes unenciphered active
H1040.07The Voynich Manuscript encodes a late medieval Moravian (Old Czech/Slavic) dialect using a constructactive
H1050.14The Voynich script is a semi-syllabic system derived from Balkan scribal traditions, where complex gactive
H1060.06The Voynich Manuscript is a trilingual pharmaceutical compendium encoding plant-based medicine in a active
H1070.3974.4% of Voynich plant illustrations match Mediterranean species at >=80% confidence: 100% Mediterraactive
H1080.56The word 'daiin' (799 occurrences, rank 1) decomposes as 'da' (give) + 'in' (in water), a pharmaceutactive
H1090.20Jaccard Index between Voynich vocabulary and proposed decipherment vocabulary is J~0.08, independentactive
H1100.76The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from the set {y, active
H1110.78The Currier A and Currier B sub-corpora use two structurally distinct cipher tables encoding the samactive
H1120.13The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1130.75The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unencipheractive
H1140.48The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d accounting for most word starts) and word-active
H1150.92The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying language but use two structurally distincactive
H1160.86The anomalously low entropy in the zodiac (3.7149 bits) and astronomical (3.7471 bits) sections relaactive
H1170.82The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: a systematic suffix composed of word-final glyphactive
H1180.85The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — the largest section by word coactive
H1190.65The glyph positional constraints (word-initial set {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final set {y,n,l,r,o}) are prodactive
H1200.75The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially produced by a systematic suffix morphology where word-active
H1210.85Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct homophonic cipher tables mapping a single undeactive
H1220.81The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1230.77The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects an underlyiactive
H1240.52The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} and word-final constraints {y, n, l, r, active
H1250.75The Voynich glyphs encode a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin, where the 25 glyphs maactive
H1260.72The anomalously high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially produced by a systematic word-final suffixactive
H1270.82The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents a functactive
H1280.83Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets in which a core set of glyactive
H1290.63The Zipf exponent of 0.8946 (below the natural-language baseline of ~1.0) is caused by systematic woactive
H1300.77The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher where word-final glyphs {y, n, l, r, o} functactive
H1310.79The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) results from a laactive
H1320.87The Currier A and Currier B sub-corpora use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets that both encactive
H1330.76The high word-initial glyph constraint ({o,c,q,s,d} dominating word starts) and word-final glyph conactive
H1340.73The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects a prose regactive
H1350.74The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from {y,n,l,r,o} active
H1360.76The Currier A and Currier B sub-corpora use two structurally distinct homophonic cipher tables encodactive
H1370.81The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is explained by aactive
H1380.76The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H1390.60The Voynich script encodes plaintext using a systematic nulls-and-abbreviations scheme in which rougactive
2026-04-15
Surprise: 0.0169Beliefs: 42 → 42
154
Total
125
Active
22
Eliminated
77
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.21The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.98The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.97The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.30The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.89The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.79The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.97The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.48The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.97The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.80The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.45The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.97The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.89The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.96The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.82The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.67The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.89The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.95The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.17The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.97The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.98The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.72Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.98The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.98The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.97Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.83The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.98The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.95The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.96The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.97The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0460.98The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.98The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.97The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.97The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.95The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.97The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.98The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.98The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.85Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.96The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.97The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.95The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.96The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.96The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.96The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0620.94The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.95The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.96The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.43The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.93The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.05The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0690.94The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.88The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.94The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.78The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.65The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.89The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.92The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.95The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.63The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.91The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0800.04The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the eliminated
H0810.91The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.83The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.86The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.85The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.88The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.78The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.05The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaactive
H0880.70The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
H0890.65The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where 2-4 glyphactive
H0900.88The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs drawn from the set {active
H0910.83The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0920.90Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher tables (not merely two scribal hands) eactive
H0930.86The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) encodes running prose rather thanactive
H0940.17The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs from the set {y,n,l,active
H0950.88Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying active
H0960.81The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is produced by a active
H0970.85The strong positional constraints on word-initial glyphs {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyphs {y,n,l,r,active
H0980.83The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents unenciphered or minimally enciphereactive
H0990.16The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from {y,n,l,r,o} active
H1000.74Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlyiactive
H1010.80The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1020.51The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are artifactsactive
H1030.77The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) encodes unenciphered active
H1040.09The Voynich Manuscript encodes a late medieval Moravian (Old Czech/Slavic) dialect using a constructactive
H1050.18The Voynich script is a semi-syllabic system derived from Balkan scribal traditions, where complex gactive
H1060.08The Voynich Manuscript is a trilingual pharmaceutical compendium encoding plant-based medicine in a active
H1070.4074.4% of Voynich plant illustrations match Mediterranean species at >=80% confidence: 100% Mediterraactive
H1080.55The word 'daiin' (799 occurrences, rank 1) decomposes as 'da' (give) + 'in' (in water), a pharmaceutactive
H1090.26Jaccard Index between Voynich vocabulary and proposed decipherment vocabulary is J~0.08, independentactive
H1100.73The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from the set {y, active
H1110.74The Currier A and Currier B sub-corpora use two structurally distinct cipher tables encoding the samactive
H1120.15The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1130.71The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unencipheractive
H1140.46The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d accounting for most word starts) and word-active
H1150.90The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying language but use two structurally distincactive
H1160.84The anomalously low entropy in the zodiac (3.7149 bits) and astronomical (3.7471 bits) sections relaactive
H1170.79The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: a systematic suffix composed of word-final glyphactive
H1180.82The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — the largest section by word coactive
H1190.64The glyph positional constraints (word-initial set {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final set {y,n,l,r,o}) are prodactive
H1200.72The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially produced by a systematic suffix morphology where word-active
H1210.82Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct homophonic cipher tables mapping a single undeactive
H1220.79The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1230.73The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects an underlyiactive
H1240.50The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} and word-final constraints {y, n, l, r, active
H1250.71The Voynich glyphs encode a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin, where the 25 glyphs maactive
H1260.67The anomalously high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially produced by a systematic word-final suffixactive
H1270.79The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents a functactive
H1280.80Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets in which a core set of glyactive
H1290.59The Zipf exponent of 0.8946 (below the natural-language baseline of ~1.0) is caused by systematic woactive
H1300.74The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher where word-final glyphs {y, n, l, r, o} functactive
H1310.78The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) results from a laactive
H1320.84The Currier A and Currier B sub-corpora use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets that both encactive
H1330.72The high word-initial glyph constraint ({o,c,q,s,d} dominating word starts) and word-final glyph conactive
H1340.69The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects a prose regactive
2026-04-15
Surprise: 0.0208Beliefs: 41 → 42
149
Total
121
Active
21
Eliminated
72
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.19The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.97The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.97The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.29The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.88The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.96The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.42The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.96The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.79The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.39The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.97The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.88The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.96The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.81The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.63The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.88The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.95The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.16The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.97The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.98The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.71Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.97The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.98The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.97Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.82The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.98The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.94The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.96The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.96The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0460.98The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.98The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.96The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.97The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.94The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.97The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.98The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.97The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.84Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.95The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.96The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.94The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.95The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.95The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.95The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0620.93The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.94The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.95The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.37The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.91The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.07The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0690.93The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.86The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.92The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.76The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.63The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.88The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.91The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.94The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.61The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.89The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0790.05The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maeliminated
H0800.05The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the active
H0810.89The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.81The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.84The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.83The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.86The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.76The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.06The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaactive
H0880.69The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
H0890.63The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where 2-4 glyphactive
H0900.86The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs drawn from the set {active
H0910.81The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0920.88Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher tables (not merely two scribal hands) eactive
H0930.84The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) encodes running prose rather thanactive
H0940.21The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs from the set {y,n,l,active
H0950.86Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying active
H0960.80The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is produced by a active
H0970.83The strong positional constraints on word-initial glyphs {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyphs {y,n,l,r,active
H0980.81The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents unenciphered or minimally enciphereactive
H0990.19The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from {y,n,l,r,o} active
H1000.71Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlyiactive
H1010.78The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1020.49The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are artifactsactive
H1030.74The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) encodes unenciphered active
H1040.11The Voynich Manuscript encodes a late medieval Moravian (Old Czech/Slavic) dialect using a constructactive
H1050.22The Voynich script is a semi-syllabic system derived from Balkan scribal traditions, where complex gactive
H1060.07The Voynich Manuscript is a trilingual pharmaceutical compendium encoding plant-based medicine in a active
H1070.4174.4% of Voynich plant illustrations match Mediterranean species at >=80% confidence: 100% Mediterraactive
H1080.53The word 'daiin' (799 occurrences, rank 1) decomposes as 'da' (give) + 'in' (in water), a pharmaceutactive
H1090.26Jaccard Index between Voynich vocabulary and proposed decipherment vocabulary is J~0.08, independentactive
H1100.70The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from the set {y, active
H1110.69The Currier A and Currier B sub-corpora use two structurally distinct cipher tables encoding the samactive
H1120.19The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1130.66The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unencipheractive
H1140.44The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d accounting for most word starts) and word-active
H1150.88The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying language but use two structurally distincactive
H1160.82The anomalously low entropy in the zodiac (3.7149 bits) and astronomical (3.7471 bits) sections relaactive
H1170.76The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: a systematic suffix composed of word-final glyphactive
H1180.80The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — the largest section by word coactive
H1190.63The glyph positional constraints (word-initial set {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final set {y,n,l,r,o}) are prodactive
H1200.69The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially produced by a systematic suffix morphology where word-active
H1210.79Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct homophonic cipher tables mapping a single undeactive
H1220.76The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1230.69The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects an underlyiactive
H1240.48The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} and word-final constraints {y, n, l, r, active
H1250.66The Voynich glyphs encode a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin, where the 25 glyphs maactive
H1260.61The anomalously high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially produced by a systematic word-final suffixactive
H1270.75The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents a functactive
H1280.76Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets in which a core set of glyactive
H1290.54The Zipf exponent of 0.8946 (below the natural-language baseline of ~1.0) is caused by systematic woactive
2026-04-15
Surprise: 0.0195Beliefs: 40 → 41
144
Total
117
Active
20
Eliminated
66
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.09The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.97The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.96The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.22The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.87The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.96The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.35The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.96The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.79The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.32The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.96The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.88The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.95The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.80The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.77The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.88The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.95The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.20The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.96The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.97The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.70Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.97The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.97The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.97Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.81The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.98The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.94The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.95The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.96The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0460.97The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.98The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.96The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.97The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.93The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.96The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.97The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.97The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.83Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.94The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.96The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.93The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.94The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.94The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.94The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0620.91The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.94The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.94The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.29The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.90The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.08The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.04The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coeliminated
H0690.91The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.85The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.91The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.75The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.62The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.86The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.89The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.93The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.60The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.88The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0790.06The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0800.07The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the active
H0810.87The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.79The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.81The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.80The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.84The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.75The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.08The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaactive
H0880.67The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
H0890.62The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where 2-4 glyphactive
H0900.84The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs drawn from the set {active
H0910.79The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0920.86Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher tables (not merely two scribal hands) eactive
H0930.82The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) encodes running prose rather thanactive
H0940.25The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs from the set {y,n,l,active
H0950.83Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying active
H0960.79The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is produced by a active
H0970.80The strong positional constraints on word-initial glyphs {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyphs {y,n,l,r,active
H0980.79The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents unenciphered or minimally enciphereactive
H0990.23The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from {y,n,l,r,o} active
H1000.67Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlyiactive
H1010.75The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1020.47The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are artifactsactive
H1030.69The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) encodes unenciphered active
H1040.15The Voynich Manuscript encodes a late medieval Moravian (Old Czech/Slavic) dialect using a constructactive
H1050.28The Voynich script is a semi-syllabic system derived from Balkan scribal traditions, where complex gactive
H1060.09The Voynich Manuscript is a trilingual pharmaceutical compendium encoding plant-based medicine in a active
H1070.4074.4% of Voynich plant illustrations match Mediterranean species at >=80% confidence: 100% Mediterraactive
H1080.51The word 'daiin' (799 occurrences, rank 1) decomposes as 'da' (give) + 'in' (in water), a pharmaceutactive
H1090.25Jaccard Index between Voynich vocabulary and proposed decipherment vocabulary is J~0.08, independentactive
H1100.66The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from the set {y, active
H1110.64The Currier A and Currier B sub-corpora use two structurally distinct cipher tables encoding the samactive
H1120.23The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1130.60The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unencipheractive
H1140.42The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d accounting for most word starts) and word-active
H1150.86The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying language but use two structurally distincactive
H1160.79The anomalously low entropy in the zodiac (3.7149 bits) and astronomical (3.7471 bits) sections relaactive
H1170.72The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: a systematic suffix composed of word-final glyphactive
H1180.76The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — the largest section by word coactive
H1190.61The glyph positional constraints (word-initial set {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final set {y,n,l,r,o}) are prodactive
H1200.65The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially produced by a systematic suffix morphology where word-active
H1210.76Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct homophonic cipher tables mapping a single undeactive
H1220.73The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1230.64The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects an underlyiactive
H1240.46The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} and word-final constraints {y, n, l, r, active
2026-04-15
Surprise: 0.0215Beliefs: 39 → 40
139
Total
113
Active
19
Eliminated
61
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.11The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.96The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.96The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.76The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.95The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.43The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.95The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.78The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.24The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.95The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.87The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.94The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.79The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.74The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.87The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.94The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.26The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.96The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.97The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.69Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.96The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.97The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.96Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.79The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.97The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.93The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.94The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.97The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.95The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0460.97The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.97The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.95The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.96The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.92The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.96The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.97The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.96The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.81Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.94The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.95The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.93The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.93The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.93The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.93The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.05The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-feliminated
H0620.90The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.93The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.93The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.21The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.88The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.10The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.05The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
H0690.90The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.83The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.90The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.73The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.60The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.84The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.87The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.92The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.58The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.86The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0790.08The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0800.08The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the active
H0810.85The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.77The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.78The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.77The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.82The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.73The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.09The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaactive
H0880.64The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
H0890.60The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where 2-4 glyphactive
H0900.82The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs drawn from the set {active
H0910.76The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0920.84Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher tables (not merely two scribal hands) eactive
H0930.79The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) encodes running prose rather thanactive
H0940.31The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs from the set {y,n,l,active
H0950.81Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying active
H0960.78The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is produced by a active
H0970.77The strong positional constraints on word-initial glyphs {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyphs {y,n,l,r,active
H0980.76The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents unenciphered or minimally enciphereactive
H0990.29The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from {y,n,l,r,o} active
H1000.63Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlyiactive
H1010.72The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1020.45The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are artifactsactive
H1030.64The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) encodes unenciphered active
H1040.14The Voynich Manuscript encodes a late medieval Moravian (Old Czech/Slavic) dialect using a constructactive
H1050.27The Voynich script is a semi-syllabic system derived from Balkan scribal traditions, where complex gactive
H1060.12The Voynich Manuscript is a trilingual pharmaceutical compendium encoding plant-based medicine in a active
H1070.3974.4% of Voynich plant illustrations match Mediterranean species at >=80% confidence: 100% Mediterraactive
H1080.49The word 'daiin' (799 occurrences, rank 1) decomposes as 'da' (give) + 'in' (in water), a pharmaceutactive
H1090.31Jaccard Index between Voynich vocabulary and proposed decipherment vocabulary is J~0.08, independentactive
H1100.62The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from the set {y, active
H1110.57The Currier A and Currier B sub-corpora use two structurally distinct cipher tables encoding the samactive
H1120.28The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1130.54The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unencipheractive
H1140.40The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d accounting for most word starts) and word-active
H1150.84The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying language but use two structurally distincactive
H1160.75The anomalously low entropy in the zodiac (3.7149 bits) and astronomical (3.7471 bits) sections relaactive
H1170.67The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: a systematic suffix composed of word-final glyphactive
H1180.72The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — the largest section by word coactive
H1190.60The glyph positional constraints (word-initial set {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final set {y,n,l,r,o}) are prodactive
2026-04-14
Surprise: 0.0313Beliefs: 31 → 31
88
Total
66
Active
15
Eliminated
29
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.20The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.15The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.76The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.78The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.29The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.14The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.30The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.29The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.98The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.90The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.22The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.05The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commeliminated
H0310.89The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.88The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.93The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.56Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.06The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.86The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.88The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.85Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.64The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.89The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.81The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.85The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.90The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.81The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.13The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.87The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.88The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.82The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.84The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.79The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.84The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.87The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.86The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.67Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.75The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.78The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.79The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.72The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.73The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.73The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.28The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.55The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.71The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.74The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.50The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.55The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.58The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.31The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
2026-04-14
Surprise: 0.0228Beliefs: 39 → 39
123
Total
98
Active
18
Eliminated
53
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.10The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.95The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.94The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.09The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.85The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.74The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.93The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.42The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.93The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.76The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.37The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.94The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.85The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.92The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.76The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.68The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.85The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.94The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.22The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.95The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.96The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.97The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.66Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.95The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.96The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.95Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.77The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.97The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.91The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.93The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.97The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.93The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0460.96The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.96The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.94The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.94The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.91The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.94The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.96The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.95The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.79Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.91The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.93The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.91The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.91The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.91The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.91The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.07The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.86The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.90The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.91The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.16The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.84The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.14The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.08The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
H0690.86The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.78The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.85The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.70The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.57The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.80The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.83The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.89The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.55The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.81The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0790.13The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0800.12The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the active
H0810.79The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.71The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.71The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.68The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.75The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.70The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.14The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaactive
H0880.60The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
H0890.57The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where 2-4 glyphactive
H0900.75The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs drawn from the set {active
H0910.70The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0920.78Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher tables (not merely two scribal hands) eactive
H0930.71The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) encodes running prose rather thanactive
H0940.46The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs from the set {y,n,l,active
H0950.74Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying active
H0960.74The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is produced by a active
H0970.69The strong positional constraints on word-initial glyphs {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyphs {y,n,l,r,active
H0980.70The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents unenciphered or minimally enciphereactive
H0990.43The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is substantially artifactual: word-final glyphs drawn from {y,n,l,r,o} active
H1000.54Currier A and Currier B employ two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlyiactive
H1010.65The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H1020.40The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are artifactsactive
H1030.52The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) encodes unenciphered active
2026-04-14
Surprise: 0.0235Beliefs: 38 → 39
118
Total
93
Active
18
Eliminated
51
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.07The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.94The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.93The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.12The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.92The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.35The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.92The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.75The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.45The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.92The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.91The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.74The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.64The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.84The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.93The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.13The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.94The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.95The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.97The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.65Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.94The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.95The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.94Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.75The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.96The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.90The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.92The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.96The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.92The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0460.95The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.95The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.93The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.94The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.89The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.94The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.95The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.94The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.78Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.90The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.92The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.90The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.89The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.89The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.89The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.09The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.83The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.88The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.90The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.21The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.82The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.18The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.09The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
H0690.84The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.76The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.83The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.68The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.55The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.78The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.80The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.87The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.53The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.78The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0790.16The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0800.15The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the active
H0810.75The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.67The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.66The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.63The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.71The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.68The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.17The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaactive
H0880.57The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
H0890.56The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where 2-4 glyphactive
H0900.71The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs drawn from the set {active
H0910.67The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0920.74Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher tables (not merely two scribal hands) eactive
H0930.67The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) encodes running prose rather thanactive
H0940.56The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs from the set {y,n,l,active
H0950.70Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying active
H0960.73The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is produced by a active
H0970.64The strong positional constraints on word-initial glyphs {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyphs {y,n,l,r,active
H0980.66The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents unenciphered or minimally enciphereactive
2026-04-14
Surprise: 0.0237Beliefs: 34 → 38
113
Total
88
Active
18
Eliminated
48
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.09The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.93The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.92The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.10The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.83The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.72The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.90The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.44The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.05The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.eliminated
H0110.91The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.74The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.56The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.91The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.83The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.89The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.60The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.83The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.93The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.17The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.94The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.94The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.97The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.64Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.93The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.94The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.93Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.73The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.95The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.89The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.91The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.95The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.91The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.05The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raeliminated
H0460.94The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.95The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.91The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.93The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.88The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.93The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.94The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.93The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.76Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.88The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.90The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.88The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.88The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.87The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.87The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.10The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.80The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.86The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.88The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.28The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.79The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.21The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.12The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
H0690.82The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.73The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.80The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.66The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.54The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.75The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.77The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.85The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.51The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.74The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0790.20The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0800.18The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the active
H0810.70The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.63The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.60The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.57The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.67The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.66The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.21The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaactive
H0880.54The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
H0890.54The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where 2-4 glyphactive
H0900.66The 70.1% hapax ratio is substantially artifactual: stripping word-final glyphs drawn from the set {active
H0910.63The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0920.69Currier A and Currier B use two structurally distinct cipher tables (not merely two scribal hands) eactive
H0930.61The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) encodes running prose rather thanactive
2026-04-14
Surprise: 0.0239Beliefs: 34 → 34
108
Total
85
Active
16
Eliminated
46
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.12The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.91The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.90The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.12The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.71The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.89The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.38The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.06The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.89The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.73The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.51The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.90The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.87The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.71The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.55The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.82The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.92The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.21The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.93The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.93The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.96The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.62Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.92The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.93The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.92Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.72The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.94The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.88The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.90The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.95The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.90The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.06The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.93The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.94The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.90The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.91The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.86The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.91The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.93The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.92The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.74Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.86The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.88The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.87The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.85The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.85The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.85The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.13The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.77The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.84The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.86The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.38The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.76The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.26The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.14The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
H0690.79The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.70The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.77The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.64The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.52The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.72The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.73The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.82The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.49The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.69The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0790.27The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0800.22The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the active
H0810.65The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.59The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.54The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
H0840.50The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0850.61The Currier A and B sub-corpora use two distinct cipher alphabets encoding the same underlying Latinactive
H0860.63The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-register encoding — short fixed-length labels draactive
H0870.25The extremely high hapax legomena ratio (70.1% of 8,261 unique word types) is generated by a systemaactive
H0880.51The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents either active
2026-04-14
Surprise: 0.0267Beliefs: 33 → 34
103
Total
80
Active
16
Eliminated
45
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.14The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.90The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.10The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.80The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.70The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.87The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.37The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.07The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.87The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.72The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.45The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.49The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.81The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.99The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.92The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.11The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.92The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.92The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.95The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.61Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0360.91The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.92The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.90Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.70The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.94The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.86The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.89The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.94The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.88The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.07The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.92The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.93The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.88The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.90The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.85The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.90The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.92The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.91The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.73Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.84The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.86The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.85The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.83The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.83The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.83The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.15The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.72The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.82The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.83The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.37The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.71The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.32The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.17The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
H0690.75The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.66The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.72The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.61The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.50The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.69The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.69The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.79The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.47The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.65The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
H0790.33The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0800.27The extreme hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic word-boundary segmentation error in the active
H0810.59The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0820.54The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0830.47The strong word-initial and word-final glyph positional constraints ({o,c,q,s,d} and {y,n,l,r,o}) reactive
2026-04-14
Surprise: 0.0263Beliefs: 32 → 33
98
Total
75
Active
16
Eliminated
40
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.18The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.88The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.86The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.13The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.31The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.09The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.85The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.71The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.38The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.82The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.43The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.79The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.98The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.91The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.14The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.91The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.91The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.95The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.59Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.04The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheeliminated
H0360.90The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.91The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.89Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.68The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.92The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.85The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.88The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.93The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.86The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.09The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.91The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.91The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.86The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.88The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.83The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.88The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.91The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.90The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.71Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.82The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.84The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.84The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.80The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.80The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.80The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.19The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.68The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.79The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.81The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.45The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.67The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.39The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.21The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
H0690.71The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.62The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.68The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.59The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.48The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
H0740.65The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is an artifact of systematic suffix variation: scribes appendactive
H0750.64The Currier A and B sub-corpora encode the same underlying plaintext language using two different buactive
H0760.75The zodiac section's anomalously low glyph entropy (3.7149 bits vs. corpus mean 3.8627 bits) is fullactive
H0770.45The glyph positional constraints (word-initial {o,c,q,s,d}, word-final {y,n,l,r,o}) are not cipher aactive
H0780.59The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) combined with its smactive
2026-04-14
Surprise: 0.0277Beliefs: 31 → 32
93
Total
71
Active
15
Eliminated
35
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.17The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.68The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.22The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.12The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.70The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.31The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.83The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.79The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.36The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.98The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.91The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.17The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0310.90The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.90The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.94The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.58Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.05The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.88The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.89The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.87Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.66The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.91The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.83The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.86The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.92The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.84The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.11The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.89The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.90The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.84The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.86The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.81The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.86The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.89The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.88The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.69Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.79The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.81The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.82The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.76The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.77The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.77The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.23The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.62The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.75The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.78The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0650.38The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 2-3 Voynich glyphs maactive
H0660.61The Currier A/B split encodes two different scribal dialects of the same underlying language (not twactive
H0670.48The zodiac and astronomical sections use a label-encoding scheme where words are proper nouns or fixactive
H0680.26The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation coactive
H0690.66The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or miniactive
H0700.57The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-agglutination cipher mechaactive
H0710.62The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in Currier A sections, active
H0720.56The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure reflect a fixedactive
H0730.46The dominant word-initial glyph constraints {o, c, q, s, d} are artifacts of a cipher mechanism thatactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0868Beliefs: 6 → 7
5
Total
5
Active
0
Eliminated
0
High confidence
H0010.72The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.42The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.57The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.49The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.23The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0485Beliefs: 13 → 13
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
3
High confidence
H0010.88The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.21The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.14The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.36The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.16The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.25The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.35The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.50The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.58The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.47The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.51The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.37The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.64The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.37The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.67The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.34The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.62The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0412Beliefs: 11 → 13
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
3
High confidence
H0010.89The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.11The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.13The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.28The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.15The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.25The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.29The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.50The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.58The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.47The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.51The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.37The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.64The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.38The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.67The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.34The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.62The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0395Beliefs: 11 → 11
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
3
High confidence
H0010.88The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.23The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.15The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.76The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.78The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.28The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.11The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.13The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.36The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.50The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.58The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.47The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.51The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.37The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0351Beliefs: 11 → 11
44
Total
24
Active
13
Eliminated
2
High confidence
H0010.87The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.14The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.19The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.27The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.14The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.67The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.71The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.60The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.28The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.75The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0260Beliefs: 31 → 31
84
Total
63
Active
14
Eliminated
25
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.18The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.19The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.67The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.22The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.71The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.60The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.75The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.98The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.89The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.20The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.06The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.88The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.86The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.92The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.54Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.08The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.83The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.86The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.82Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.61The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.88The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.78The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.83The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.89The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.78The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.16The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.85The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.86The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.79The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.82The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.76The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.82The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.85The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.83The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.65Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.71The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.74The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.77The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.67The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.69The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
H0600.69The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin where 25 glyphs encode appractive
H0610.34The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic scribal abbreviation scheme in which word-factive
H0620.47The Currier A/B split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying Latin text usingactive
H0630.66The zodiac and astronomical sections (entropy 3.7149 and 3.7471 bits respectively, lowest of all secactive
H0640.70The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0271Beliefs: 11 → 11
40
Total
19
Active
14
Eliminated
1
High confidence
H0010.86The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.73The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.64The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.70The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.17The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.71The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.66The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.20The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.72The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.67The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.58The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.03PARSE_FAILEDeliminated
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0275Beliefs: 31 → 31
79
Total
58
Active
14
Eliminated
21
High confidence
H0010.78The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.73The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.64The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.70The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.17The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.71The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.66The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.20The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.72The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.67The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.58The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0274Beliefs: 31 → 31
79
Total
58
Active
14
Eliminated
23
High confidence
H0010.79The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.73The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.64The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.70The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.17The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.71The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.66The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.20The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.72The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.67The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.58The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0255Beliefs: 31 → 31
79
Total
57
Active
15
Eliminated
27
High confidence
H0010.98The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.28The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.27The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.76The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.78The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.89The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.73The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.32The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.42The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.98The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.89The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.19The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.07The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.86The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.84The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.90The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.53Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.09The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.81The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.83The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.79Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.59The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.85The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.76The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.81The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.87The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.75The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.19The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.83The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.83The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.75The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.79The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.73The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.79The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.83The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.81The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.63Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0265Beliefs: 29 → 31
79
Total
57
Active
15
Eliminated
27
High confidence
H0010.99The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.15The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.27The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.76The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.78The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0110.89The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.73The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.19The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.42The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.98The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.89The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.13The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.07The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.86The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.84The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.90The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.53Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.09The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.81The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.83The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.79Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.59The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.85The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.76The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.81The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.87The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.75The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.19The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.83The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.83The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.75The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.79The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.73The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.79The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.83The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.81The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.63Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
H0550.66The Voynich text uses a homophonic substitution cipher on medieval Latin or Italian, where multiple active
H0560.69The Currier A/B split reflects two scribes encoding the same underlying language using two differentactive
H0570.74The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0580.62The word-initial glyph constraints {o,c,q,s,d} and word-final glyph constraints {y,n,l,r,o} are artiactive
H0590.64The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) and the recipes sectactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0279Beliefs: 29 → 29
74
Total
52
Active
15
Eliminated
22
High confidence
H0010.98The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.19The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.39The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.05The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.eliminated
H0110.87The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.72The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.23The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.82The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.35The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.97The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.88The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.17The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.09The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.84The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.81The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.89The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.51Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.12The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.78The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.81The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.76Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.56The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.83The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.73The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.79The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.84The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.71The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.23The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.80The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.80The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.71The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.75The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.70The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.75The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.80The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.78The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.60Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0292Beliefs: 29 → 29
74
Total
53
Active
14
Eliminated
17
High confidence
H0010.98The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.24The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.14The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.92The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.32The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.07The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.85The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.71The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.14The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.83The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.79The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.27The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.75The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.99The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.97The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.87The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.22The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.10The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.82The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.78The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.87The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.49Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.14The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.74The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.78The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.72Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.53The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.80The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.70The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.76The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.82The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.66The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.29The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.77The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.77The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.66The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.71The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.67The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.71The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.76The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.74The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.58Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0274Beliefs: 29 → 29
74
Total
53
Active
14
Eliminated
16
High confidence
H0010.81The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.73The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.64The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.70The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.17The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.71The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.66The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.20The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.72The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.67The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.58The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0299Beliefs: 26 → 29
74
Total
53
Active
14
Eliminated
17
High confidence
H0010.98The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.14The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.95The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.94The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.83The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.72The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.90The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.30The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.08The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.70The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.18The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.45The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.83The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.99The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.98The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.97The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.86The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.28The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.13The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.80The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.75The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.85The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.47Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.17The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.70The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.74The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.68Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.50The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.76The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.66The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.73The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.79The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.60The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.35The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.73The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.72The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.61The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.67The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
H0500.63The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic null-suffix appended to a smalleractive
H0510.66The Currier A/B scribal split encodes the same underlying language but with two distinct homophonic active
H0520.72The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) is caused by a laactive
H0530.70The text-only section's elevated entropy (3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) reflects unenciphereactive
H0540.55Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d dominating) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l,active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0339Beliefs: 21 → 26
69
Total
48
Active
14
Eliminated
15
High confidence
H0010.98The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.17The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.94The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.93The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.21The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.71The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.89The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.22The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.11The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.71The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.60The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.40The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.82The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.98The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.98The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.96The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.85The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.27The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.15The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.78The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.71The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.82The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.45Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.21The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.65The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.69The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.62Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.47The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.72The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.62The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.70The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.76The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.54The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
H0450.43The high hapax ratio (70.1%) arises from a systematic abbreviation or suffix-stripping convention raactive
H0460.69The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits) and label-heavy structure indicate it useactive
H0470.68The Currier A/B scribal split represents two different scribes encoding the same underlying languageactive
H0480.54The dominant word-initial glyph constraint (o, c, q, s, d account for most word starts) reflects a cactive
H0490.61The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits — second highest and largest woractive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0338Beliefs: 21 → 21
64
Total
43
Active
14
Eliminated
17
High confidence
H0010.98The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.14The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.93The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.92The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.26The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.80The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.70The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.87The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.29The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.13The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.67The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.47The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.90The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.87The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.71The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.33The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.81The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.98The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.98The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.96The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.84The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.19The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.19The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.75The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.66The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.79The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.42Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.26The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.59The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.65The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.56Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.44The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.67The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.57The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.66The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.72The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.47The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0426Beliefs: 11 → 11
39
Total
19
Active
13
Eliminated
0
High confidence
H0010.77The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.14The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.69The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.15The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.71The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.64The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.15The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.66The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.65The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.19The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.68The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.72The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.61The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.55The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.72The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0334Beliefs: 18 → 21
63
Total
42
Active
14
Eliminated
17
High confidence
H0010.98The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.17The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.91The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.90The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.28The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.14The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.91The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.74The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.46The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.90The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.87The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.71The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.81The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.98The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.98The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.96The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.84The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.32The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.99The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.99The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.19The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.75The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.66The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.79The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.42Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.26The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.59The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.65The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.56Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.44The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
H0400.67The Currier A/B split corresponds to two different scribal hands applying the same underlying cipheractive
H0410.57The extremely high hapax ratio (70.1%) is produced by a systematic suffix-stripping or abbreviation active
H0420.66The zodiac section's anomalously low entropy (3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) reflects a label-active
H0430.72The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) contains unenciphered or minimaactive
H0440.47The dominance of word-initial glyphs o, c, q, s, d and word-final glyphs y, n, l, r, o reflects a Viactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0299Beliefs: 17 → 18
59
Total
38
Active
14
Eliminated
16
High confidence
H0010.98The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.22The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.90The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.08The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.68The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.18The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.89The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.73The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.40The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.25The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.79The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.98The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.99The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.98The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.95The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.83The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.24The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.98The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.23The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.72The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.60The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.76The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.40Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.31The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.53The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.59The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.49Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.40The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0320Beliefs: 17 → 17
59
Total
38
Active
14
Eliminated
15
High confidence
H0010.98The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.28The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.88The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.86The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.11The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.76The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.78The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.46The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.16The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.87The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.72The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.32The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.82The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.38The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.97The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.98The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.97The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.95The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.82The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.20The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.98The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.28The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.69The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.54The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.72The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.38Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
H0350.31The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is largely an artifact of a systematic abbreviation or truncation cipheactive
H0360.53The Currier A/B split encodes two different plaintext languages (e.g., Latin in sections assigned toactive
H0370.59The zodiac and label-heavy sections (zodiac entropy 3.7149 bits, astronomical 3.7471 bits) use a homactive
H0380.49Word-initial glyph constraints (o, c, q, s, d) and word-final glyph constraints (y, n, l, r, o) are active
H0390.40The recipes section (25 folios, 11,611 words, entropy 3.8586 bits) and the herbal section (129 folioactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0250Beliefs: 17 → 17
59
Total
38
Active
14
Eliminated
14
High confidence
H0010.97The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.34The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.13The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.40The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.11The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.87The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.72The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.32The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.82The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.31The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.97The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.98The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.97The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.95The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.82The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.99The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.15The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.98The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.28The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.69The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.54The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.72The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.38Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0225Beliefs: 17 → 17
54
Total
33
Active
14
Eliminated
15
High confidence
H0010.97The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.33The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.32The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.71The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.89The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.33The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.15The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.85The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.71The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.24The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.83The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.79The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.29The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.97The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.98The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.97The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.94The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.81The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.98The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.19The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.98The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
H0300.34The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is primarily an artifact of systematic scribal abbreviation, where commactive
H0310.65The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-only encoding scheme wactive
H0320.47The Currier A/B dialect split reflects two scribal hands encoding the same underlying language usingactive
H0330.67The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, highest of all sections) represents unenciphered or lighactive
H0340.35Glyph positional constraints (specific glyphs appearing predominantly word-initially vs word-finallyactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0230Beliefs: 17 → 17
54
Total
33
Active
14
Eliminated
12
High confidence
H0010.97The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.26The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.31The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.80The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.70The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.87The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.32The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.13The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.70The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.23The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.28The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.75The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.97The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.98The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.96The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.94The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.80The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.98The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.18The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.98The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.98The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0274Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
11
High confidence
H0010.82The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.73The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.64The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.70The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.17The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.71The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.66The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.20The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.72The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.67The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.58The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0266Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
12
High confidence
H0010.97The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.08The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.90The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.30The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.31The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.11The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.29The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.71The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.60The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.44The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.81The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.96The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.97The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.96The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.93The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.78The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.98The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.17The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.97The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.97The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0254Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
14
High confidence
H0010.97The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.10The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.88The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.86The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.21The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.68The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.23The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.14The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.67The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.42The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.37The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.79The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.95The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.97The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.95The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.92The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.77The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.97The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.15The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.97The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.97The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0245Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
13
High confidence
H0010.96The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.12The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.26The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.76The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.78The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.15The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.07The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.85The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.71The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.34The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.82The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.29The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.95The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.96The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.94The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.91The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.76The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.97The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.19The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.97The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.96The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0574Beliefs: 8 → 11
34
Total
14
Active
13
Eliminated
0
High confidence
H0010.75The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.21The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.69The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.63The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.13The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.69The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.61The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.58The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.22The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.22The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.60The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.63The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.27The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.62The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0251Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
12
High confidence
H0010.96The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.15The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.24The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.19The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.09The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.70The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.27The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.83The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.79The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.94The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.96The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.93The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.90The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.74The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.96The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.09The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.96The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.96The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0272Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
10
High confidence
H0010.96The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.18The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.24The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.10The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.10The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.25The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.27The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.75The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.93The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.95The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.92The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.89The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.72The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.96The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.12The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.95The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.95The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0273Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
11
High confidence
H0010.83The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.73The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.64The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.70The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.17The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.71The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.66The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.20The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.72The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.67The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.58The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0250Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
11
High confidence
H0010.96The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.88The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.86The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.16The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.68The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.12The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.13The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.67The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.71The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.60The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.35The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.79The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.92The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.94The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.91The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.88The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.70The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.95The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.15The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.95The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.94The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0265Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
13
High confidence
H0010.95The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.19The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.76The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.78The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.15The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.05The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.87The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.72The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.25The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.82The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.28The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.91The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.93The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.90The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.86The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.69The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.94The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.20The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.94The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0290.93The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0252Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
12
High confidence
H0010.95The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.10The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.25The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.42The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.06The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.85The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.71The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.30The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.83The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.79The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.34The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.89The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.92The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.88The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.84The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.67The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.93The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.25The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.93The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.05The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âeliminated
H0290.92The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0271Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
12
High confidence
H0010.95The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.13The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.80The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.70The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.87The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.41The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.08The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.70The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.36The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.26The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.75The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.87The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.90The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.86The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.82The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.64The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.92The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.24The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.92The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.06The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.91The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0273Beliefs: 17 → 17
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
11
High confidence
H0010.84The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.73The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.64The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.70The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.17The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.71The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.66The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.20The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.72The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.67The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.58The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0284Beliefs: 16 → 17
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
12
High confidence
H0010.95The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.06The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.90The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.15The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.41The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.11The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.29The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.71The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.60The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.39The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.81The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.85The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.89The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.84The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.80The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.62The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.90The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.14The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.90The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.07The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.89The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0260Beliefs: 16 → 16
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
13
High confidence
H0010.94The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.07The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.88The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.86The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.68The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.34The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.14The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.67The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.47The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.32The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.79The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.83The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.87The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.81The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.78The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.59The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.89The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.18The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.89The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.08The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.88The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0688Beliefs: 7 → 8
30
Total
10
Active
13
Eliminated
0
High confidence
H0010.73The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.29The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.64The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.57The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.67The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.60The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.51The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.29The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.32The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0324Beliefs: 16 → 16
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
10
High confidence
H0010.94The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.09The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.22The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.76The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.78The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.26The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.05The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.eliminated
H0110.87The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.72The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.40The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.82The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.31The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.80The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.84The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.78The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.75The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.57The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.87The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.22The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.87The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.10The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.85The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0340Beliefs: 16 → 16
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
9
High confidence
H0010.93The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.10The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.84The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.13The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.43The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.06The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.85The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.71The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.31The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.83The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.79The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.23The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.77The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.81The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.75The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.72The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.54The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.84The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.29The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.85The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.12The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.83The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0295Beliefs: 16 → 16
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
7
High confidence
H0010.93The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.13The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.42The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.83The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.72The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.90The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.36The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.08The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.70The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.23The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.14The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.75The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.73The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.78The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.71The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.69The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.51The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.81The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.21The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.82The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.15The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.80The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0273Beliefs: 16 → 16
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
5
High confidence
H0010.85The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.16The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.73The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.17The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.64The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.70The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.17The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.71The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.66The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.20The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.72The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.73The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.67The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.58The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.18The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.73The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0336Beliefs: 16 → 16
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
6
High confidence
H0010.93The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0030.94The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.93The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.35The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.71The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.89The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.36The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.10The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.28The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.77The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.71The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.60The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.19The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.81The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.68The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.74The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.66The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.65The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.48The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.78The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.19The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.79The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.18The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.76The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0358Beliefs: 13 → 16
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
8
High confidence
H0010.92The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0030.93The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.92The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.35The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.80The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.70The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.87The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.28The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.13The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.75The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.67The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.14The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.81The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.24The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.79The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.63The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.70The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.60The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.61The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.45The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.74The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.24The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.76The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.23The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.72The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0367Beliefs: 13 → 13
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
7
High confidence
H0010.92The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.04The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0eliminated
H0030.91The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.90The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.28The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.69The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.21The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.07The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.85The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.71The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.17The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.85The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.82The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.28The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.57The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.65The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.54The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.56The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.41The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.70The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.32The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.72The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.28The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.67The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0420Beliefs: 13 → 13
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
7
High confidence
H0010.91The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.05The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.90The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.88The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.20The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.68The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.81The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.30The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.09The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.70The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.26The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.83The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.79The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.43The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.57The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.65The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.54The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.56The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.41The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.70The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.30The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.72The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.28The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.67The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0413Beliefs: 13 → 13
49
Total
28
Active
14
Eliminated
6
High confidence
H0010.90The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.07The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.88The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.86The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.11The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.76The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.67The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.78The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.30The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.08The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.82The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.70The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.21The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.83The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.78The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.79The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.43The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.78The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.57The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.65The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.54The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.56The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.41The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.64The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.36The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.67The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.34The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.62The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive
2026-04-13
Surprise: 0.0426Beliefs: 13 → 13
49
Total
29
Active
13
Eliminated
3
High confidence
H0010.90The manuscript's herbal section uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers, which active
H0020.09The text uses a simple substitution cipher on medieval Latin, which would produce glyph entropy ~4.0active
H0030.86The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0040.84The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0050.14The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on a language other than Latin or Italian.active
H0060.74The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0070.65The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0080.74The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0090.22The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0100.10The manuscript's text structure reflects a single, coherent narrative.active
H0110.79The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0120.69The manuscript uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological sectioactive
H0130.18The text uses a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0140.80The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0150.77The manuscript's text structure reflects a mix of prose and verse, with the herbal section being priactive
H0160.76The Currier A/B split reflects a genuine linguistic difference between two distinct languages or diaactive
H0170.63The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the biological section.active
H0180.35The text is encoded using a simple substitution cipher on an unknown language.active
H0190.77The text uses a combination of substitution and transposition ciphers in the herbal section.active
H0200.50The Voynich text encodes a natural language using a null-cipher or homophones, where multiple glyphsactive
H0210.58The Currier A/B split reflects two different scribal hands encoding the same underlying language witactive
H0220.47The zodiac and astronomical sections use a systematically different word-order encoding than herbal active
H0230.51The high hapax ratio (70.1%) is partially artifactual, caused by consistent scribal abbreviation or active
H0240.37The text-only section (7 folios, entropy 3.9016 bits — highest of all sections) represents unencipactive
H0250.64The Currier A/B split reflects two distinct scribal hands encoding the same language using differentactive
H0260.38The manuscript uses a null-derived word-construction rule (e.g., a gallows-glyph prefix system) suchactive
H0270.67The text-only section (entropy 3.9016 bits, 7 folios) represents the closest approximation to naturaactive
H0280.34The high hapax rate (70.1%) is produced by a systematic nulls-insertion or verbose encoding scheme âactive
H0290.62The zodiac section (entropy 3.7149 bits, lowest of all sections) uses a label-oriented encoding in wactive